Return to Archived List of Ask Eco-Cycle Articles

Leaf blowers not only loud, they pollute

October 31, 2003


Dear Marti,
My apartment complex is using a leaf blower and it's so loud and obnoxious. Isn't it also incredibly polluting?
Thanks,
Adam R.

Dear Adam,

Right after I got your letter I saw an ad for a leaf blower with a guy saying, "Blowing leaves around at 195 mph. Now that's the good life." It made me wonder if you and I are really missing out on something. While I've been known to slam leaf blowers and seriously question the point of relocating leaves at high speeds-mostly onto your neighbors' lawns-I do understand that there are some real reasons why people might purchase these loud polluters: aching backs, and landscaping and property maintenance companies that want to protect their employees from injury, to name a couple.

But unfortunately, leaf blowers and other tools with two-stroke engines like some lawn mowers, snow blowers, chain saws and trimmers, send 30 percent of the unburned fuel out with the exhaust.

A 2000 report by the California EPA determined that the average residential leaf blower produces 145 times more hydrocarbons, 7.5 times more carbon monoxide, and 11 times more particulate matter in one hour than a 1999-2000 light duty vehicle driven at 30 mph, getting 15 miles to the gallon. The hydrocarbon emissions produced from one-half hour of residential leaf blower operation are equal to the emissions produced from driving 2200 miles, comparable to a round trip from Denver to San Diego. Commercial leaf blowers with more horse power are even more polluting.

Pollution from dust and debris is also a significant issue. Leaf blowers' powerful engine jets have the unintended consequence of disturbing and suspending smaller particulate matter such as dust, fecal matter, pesticides, fungi, chemicals, fertilizers, spores, and street dirt that consists of lead and organic and elemental carbon, according to the California EPA.

Because of these air pollution problems associated with leaf blowers, many municipalities across the US have banned or restricted their use.

So what are those of you with aching backs or employee safety issues to do? If the rake doesn't seem to be an option, you can consider a couple of solutions. One is to let the leaves lie as mulch and fertilize your grass. You can chop up the leaves with a four-stroke or electric-powered mower (mulching mower blades help but aren't required), creating more surface area to help the leaves break down more quickly.

If you're still going for the leaf blower, limit its use to large jobs only, pulling out the broom to sweep the porch and sidewalk. If you're making a new purchase, ask for the lowest-emission models available. The EPA and the California Air and Resources Board (CARB) have begun regulating leaf blowers manufactured after the year 2000, so be sure to buy a model that has either the EPA's or CARB's certification. Consider purchasing an electric-powered blower that is less polluting and less noisy. Obviously, the cord can be an issue for larger areas, but cordless models are on the verge of entering the market- as are lower-emission, four-stroke leaf blowers and hybrids-so you might want to hold off on your purchase until these models are in the stores.

There are many more cordless options available for other two-stroke engine tools such as lawnmowers, trimmers and chain saws which have the added advantages of being lighter weight and easier to start. Once the snow falls and you're looking at pollution issues associated with snow blowers (which frequently have two-stroke engines), you might want to take the same factors into consideration before making your purchase. After all, breathing clean air is certainly part of "the good life," isn't it?